I'm sure it's been quite hectic for everyone these last few weeks amidst all the hustle and bustle!
I stumbled across an article the other day that I would like to share with everyone, and I would be delighted for a conversation to ensue!
Autism parents battle on: backers aim to reintroduce bill to require insurance coverage
After reading the article, I must admit that I am pleased to be living in a state that recognizes the need for such an extreme measure.
Personally, yes, I fully support legislation which takes care of these families.
I have my own views on healthcare and cost regulation, none of which I will share here (haha), BUT in this case, why wouldn't the government see fit to pass such a mandate? In the broadest sense of the term, autism is chronic and stable; it is non-life-threatening, and there is significant scientific evidence supporting the effectiveness of ABA (Applied Behavioral Analysis), as well as other burgeoning treatments.
The article mentions that insurance DOES cover diabetes and/or cancer.
Do NOT misunderstand me... these are legitimate health concerns that can have devastating consequences left untreated. However, diabetes can be regulated with regular diet and exercise and insulin therapy, should it be called for. Not many diabetic patients actually need extra pharmaceuticals, unless they are a bit more advanced. Cancer generally requires short bursts of aggressive therapy (should it become a cycle), but can also be palliated through diet and exercise.
So, it should stand to reason that autism should be given the same consideration. It, too, requires diet and exercise regulation, but there are more aggressive, invasive, effective treatments which are quite expensive and referral-based.
I'm interested in hearing all of YOUR thoughts, though. Let loose.
But remain respectful. :)
Blessings,
Tasha
No comments:
Post a Comment